icommons

log in
new to icommons.org? register

            
type a tag | tag cloud
meu painel
publish/create
editing queue
voting queue
icommons blog

Leo Reynolds on flickr.com iCommons.org taking some down time

iCommons.org will be unavailable for a few minutes for server maintenance on Friday, 9 May between 3:00 and 5:00 GMT.

So don't be alarmed when you can't get your hit of Commons news, we promise we'll be back in a flash! more

 
Captain Copyright reappears in Colombia
1
carobotero · Bogotá (Colombia) · Apr 01st, 2008 12:33 am · 34 votes · 5 comments
 
Mapa_Colombia, Jaycross (http://flickr.com/photos/jaycross/1111448039/), CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Mapa_Colombia, by Jaycross

This is the story of the tropical reinvention of "Captain Copyright", a cartoon superhero who was supposed to devoted his life to teaching children the virtues of copyright. Captain Copyright was the brainchild
of Access Copyright, a Canadian collecting society, and the campaign appeared at the end of 2006, "Captain Copyright" was usually portrayed flying in at the scene of a "crime" in which someone published research without proper credit. In the website dedicated to Captain Copyright, the campaign offered educational resources to be integrated into the classrooms of Canadian school children.

The Captain's classroom exercises taught young children about the limits that copyright imposes people's conduct, but failed to address other aspects of copyright, such as exceptions that favour of everyone in society; the public domain; the ability to share, and so on. At that time, commentators like Professor Geist pointed out: "there is no reference to user rights, which are particularly relevant in the education context." He concluded: "Our children need to develop love for learning, a passion for creativity, and appreciation of art and science. The exercises that are offered do not provide any of that. Instead they reduce Canadian copyright to levels not seen before. They are so shameful that they should not be included in any classroom in the country." The campaign shuttered a few months later in 2007.

Recently, the Colombian National Planning Department (DNP) submitted a document on intellectual property for approval by the National Council for Social and Economic Politics (CONPES). The DNP's document builds upon Captain Copyright's idea of protection and enforcement of copyright. As with Captain Copyright, this document emphasises developing Colombian competitiveness and development only through limits, without taking note of the freedoms that make for a balanced system of creativity.

A comprehensive reading of the document suggests that the Colombian state is focusing its efforts and resources into developing our own version of "Captain Copyright" that will give educational recommendations for children, academics and public officials and will likely produce a surveillance state.

The document's main argument is that our country's intellectual property development relies solely on "protection and enforcement". Such a conclusion is based on the fact that the revenue for intellectual property related industries is higher in developed countries than in ours. The document has absolutely no references or background research, achievements and implications of recent approaches such as Free Software, Open Access, Open Educational Resources, Open Business, etc.

Furthermore the document analysis completely ignores important changes in the intellectual property sector evident over the last few years: these aren't just legal tools for increasing copyright control, but rather legal alternatives that empower authors' to manage their rights. Today, authors can exploit new environments for business or can simply decide to share knowledge using technology. In other words, for example, is it justified that Colombian public policies remain focusing on university professors who produce printed knowledge and want to protect their production incentives? Or is it time to also start considering the digital production that follows from different formats that are equally valuable and legal?

This document is not yet public and only a few people were invited to discuss it in the last weeks -- but despite this, an Internet campaign is already bringing attention to the matter, since CONPES will soon deliberate on this public policy. We are focusing our efforts in requesting the CONPES to: (1) involve government institutions related to education and culture to point out their special needs and legal regimes in this issue, (2) to involve civil society actors interested in this topic, and (3) to immediately start drafting another document that will address the other side of the copyright regime; if despite of its limitations, the current document is still approved.

If you want to sign and support go to firmasonline.com

tags: bogota colombia policy-law public-policy copyright copyleft colombia


  comments rss add a comment  
 
Is there anything else we can do, besides signing the petition?
adapar · Santiago (Chile) · Mar 31st, 2008 6:53 am
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

If you could mirror the petition on you blog or other Internet site... to draw attention to this it will be great
carobotero · Bogotá (Colombia) · Mar 31st, 2008 9:41 am
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

kstevens I am making this post on behalf of Richard Stallman (http://stallman.org):

I am very glad that Colombians are already preparing to counter the
Captain Copyright campaign in their country. A way to do this
occurred to me: there could be a parody cartoon, in which Captain
Community protects people that Captain Copyright attacks. Captain
Community could say, "Don't you dare attack people who share!" (Alas,
I don't know how to translate that into Spanish and make it rhyme.)

It would also be good to denounce the term "intellectual property",
which is just as much a propaganda vehicle as Captain Copyright is.
The word "property" supports the same one-sided view that Captain
Copyright champions. More subtle, and thus more harmful, the term
lumps copyright law together with patent law and trademark law, even
though these laws are totally different. That leads people to suppose
that it makes sense to treat copyright law and patent law and
trademark law as one single issue. Once they start out so confused,
they can hardly understand any of these laws.

So I would like to suggest that we reject and denounce the term
"intellectual property" just as we do Captain Copyright.

See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html for more explanation.
kstevens (United States) · Apr 01st, 2008 10:42 am
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

I know this is a serious issue but the Captain Copyright sounds hilarious campaign. The idea of parody cartoon is great.

I could come-up with some politically incorrect name for this "contra hero" - you can imaging it-. but maybe the Captain Commons or Captain Community is better.

I also wonder is the Captain Copyright somehow related to the Captain Euro (http://www.theyesmen.org/hijinks/euro/) - another super hero used to educate children.
Teemu · Helsinki (Finland) · Apr 01st, 2008 4:06 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

I must admit I am using Captain Copyright as an example, because the strategies the document suggest reminded me of this cartoon when I read the document and thought I could easily explain it to non Colombians using the analogy, not that the document already suggest such character
On the other hand, the document does mix copyright and Industrial property issues, in the Open Letter to Conpes it is pointed out how we are just talking about copyright but ofcourse that is another issue: Why mixing things?
Lets see if someone develops the contra hero idea, it is certainly great!!
carobotero · Bogotá (Colombia) · Apr 01st, 2008 6:30 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame
 


  add a comment: you must be logged on in order to comment. please log in or register at iCommons.org and and your comments right after.