icommons

log in
new to icommons.org? register

            
type a tag | tag cloud
meu painel
publish/create
editing queue
voting queue
icommons blog

Altemark on flickr.com New upgrades to icommons.org

We have some exciting new upgrades to icommons.org to report! The latest updates to the site include:
- The ability to upload vertical pictures along with horizontal pictures to the site. We've also set the minimum picture size from 600 to 420 pixels, and you can upload both jpgs and pngs.
- Additions to our list of embedded videos that can be supported on the site - now video... more

 
Social(ly responsible) media
1
Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa) · Sep 03rd, 2007 4:11 pm · 54 votes · 6 comments
 
The judges' library in the Constitutional Court, Paul Jacobson (http://www.jacobson.co.za), CC BY-NC 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)
The judges' library in the Constitutional Court, by Paul Jacobson (http://www.jacobson.co.za)
One of the many fantastic things about the social media (r)evolution is that it makes it so easy to upload and share videos, photos and our typed thoughts. We can connect to people anywhere in the world where there is an Internet connection and we can begin to create a media rich archive of our lives and our culture. In other words, social media makes it possible to capture our history in a way that was simply not possible a decade ago, certainly not in our parents’ time and before that.

All this content sharing really amounts to the creation of a pretty comprehensive and detailed living archive of our lives which can be organised and sorted using contextual tools like tags. When we connect those archives to other people’s archives we add a broader context to an emerging communal archive which is bound to be of considerable importance to our descendants just as albums of old photos and letters have been of interest of us when we look back at events in our parents’ or grandparents’ youth. Taking a stroll down memory lane in the past has usually involved perusing old, faded photo albums and watching stacks of slides projected on to walls at family gatherings. A family member would often recount a story about the photo or slide and the history of the family would be passed on, in part, by word of mouth just as it has for generations.

The Web changes that. Now we record our thoughts in blogs, we post videos of events in our lives and photos detailing much more than was the case in the past. Our record of our lives has become a lifestream and we have gone so far as to start documenting the minutiae of our daily lives using microblogging tools like Twitter and Jaiku. All of this is straight from the proverbial horses’s mouth. In addition, all this content is digital and won’t fade like old photographs.

Provided there are systems in the future that will continue to access this content there will be a comprehensive and enduring cultural record from the beginning of this new millennium that will dwarf what has come before in sheer volume. This is where there is potentially a catch though. At the moment we rely on services which appear to be open. These services are designed to facilitate sharing and ease of use. What happens if Flickr, YouTube or any number of social media services close down or their repositories of content become inaccessible for any number of reasons including unsupported file formats?

If we are to realise a goal of creating a truly enduring cultural database for future generations the content we create and share today has to be future-proofed as much as possible. This means that a couple things must be done. In the first instance the content being made available through these services must be archived in the most readily accessible location possible, given current technologies and solutions. Once the content is stored in a convenient location the question then becomes whether the content is in an accessible format and this is where open standards and open access become relevant. If content is stored in proprietary formats it will be a recipe for disaster. As those formats fall out of use or are no longer developed by their creators, that content becomes inaccessible and effectively lost to all save those who still have systems that can support those file formats. There has been a similar debate about document formats specifically and we can see open access and open standards coming to the fore in the debate over Microsoft’s push to have the Office Open XML document format ratified as an ISO standard.

Without truly open file formats we will find our collections of cultural resources fading like old photographs until one day all we will have to show our descendants will be antique grey boxes in museums rather than a living, vibrant digital archive showcasing human cultural development in the 21st century.

tags: johannesburg south africa media-events social responsible policy media social-media socially-responsible-media preservation cultural heritage


  comments rss add a comment  
 
makes some profound links i had not thought of before.
Mahala (South Africa) · Sep 02nd, 2007 7:55 am
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

the world has changed so radically Paul, we definitely need to contextualise how this changes our sense of identity. Imagine what it'll be like for those whose lives have been documented visually from before they even pop into the world, something YOU will have to deal with soon ;-)
How does that change the way we tell our stories?
max kaizen · Cape Town (South Africa) · Sep 04th, 2007 8:31 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Hey Max

I don't know that it does change the way we tell our stories. It just means we can tell more stories and have an enduring record of those stories for future generations.
Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa) · Sep 05th, 2007 12:52 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

A channel that gives you the freedom to express yourself- a free councilling!
Thabz · Johannesburg (South Africa) · Sep 05th, 2007 6:31 pm
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

I agree with the changing of technology that we have no control over to preserve or data or heritage. Many have saved files on world perfect only to have them outdated. How many of us have tons of floppy discs that contain hours of our works but many new computers no longer accommodate floppies.
It is scary for us "older" users who have seen 8 mm films converted to VHS format to preserve history -now only to find those pushing the technology envelope are making it more and more difficult to share knowledge contained on VHS format- which of course was once on 8 mm format.
There are other changes I am certain others have noted but vinyl remains
popular despite the movement to 8 track which failed, tape, then the music contained on compact discs- now download to MP3 which are being phased out by something else- As a result I don't bend when the next gadget comes out but am then left behind in the technological quagmire. My kids must prompt me and teach me or I am lost with downloading-
It seems easier to be a new learner from a country that was technologically backward then an old learner from a constantly changing technological country. Old learners must unlearn and be open where the new learner just accepts, plugs in and moves on.

Elainethorne (Germany) · Sep 06th, 2007 5:49 pm
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

It is a difficult position to be in but if we hope to preserve our content then we have to keep converting into the most accessible format. At the moment that is probably a digital format stored on the Web and new digital media.
Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa) · Sep 07th, 2007 4:06 pm
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame
 


  add a comment: you must be logged on in order to comment. please log in or register at iCommons.org and and your comments right after.