|
home · articles · south african legal resources |
A key change at iCommons
If you're not part of the iCommons mailing list, take a look at the letter that Heather Ford, Executive Director of iCommons, sent to the list yesterday:
Dear friends,
At the 2 August iCommons Board Meeting, the board decided to make some difficult but necessary changes at iCommons. It has become clear over the past months that our vision for iCommons is different from the... more
|
| |
South African legal resources
Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa) · Aug 08th, 2007 11:15 am · 37 votes · 12 comments
|
| |
| The lobby of the Constitutional Court, by Paul Jacobson |
 |
|
Constitutional Court image slideshow |
by Photos by Paul Jacobson and music by His Boy Elroy under CC By-NC |
|
|
There are a number South African legal resources with varying degrees of accessibility and completeness. On the one hand there are a number of official sources of law and legal information from organs of the State like national, provincial and local legislative bodies as well as the superior courts. Official texts are generally not protected by copyright and are therefore open to all. When it comes to legislation, section 12(8)(a) of the Copyright Act provides as follows:
"No copyright shall subsist in official texts of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or in official translations of such texts, or in speeches of a political nature or in speeches delivered in the course of legal proceedings, or in news of the day that are mere items of press information."
Where copyright would vest is in unofficial texts created by publishers or any person who takes an official text and reformats that official text or otherwise creates a derivative of it. This is where access to legal resources becomes somewhat more difficult. Commercial republications of the official texts are expensive and quite simply inaccessible to the vast majority of the population. By way of example, costs for a set of legislation can be as high as R4,600 for a monthly subscription on CD-ROM or around R3,200 for the 2006/7 printed edition purchased from one of the local legal publishers. In contrast, legislation is available for free from government websites although these collections are not necessarily complete or readily accessible to a visitor to the website concerned.
Similarly, judgements handed down in South Africa’s superior courts are, in theory, available to the public although this is something of a fiction in practice. These judgements are not published in a convenient format by the courts. The legal publishers, on the other hand, republish judgements considered to be “reportable” and then sell these judgements as part of their law reports incorporating commentary on and summaries of the more pertinent judgements at a high price for most people. While these reports are fairly well organised and comprehensive and are generally available on a subscription basis, a subscription to Juta's South African Law Reports can cost R5,712 for a single user for a year for the online version and R15,112 for a quarterly update and R16,052 for monthly updates to the CD-ROM versions.
Fortunately there are initiatives to make these important legal resources more readily available to the South African public. Perhaps the most ambitious of these initiatives is the South African Legal Information Institute which is collating and scanning judgements and legislation from 16 sub-Saharan countries. This content is being made freely available on the web, at least for non-commercial purposes. Another project which is under development is the Open Law Project which aims to create a comprehensive legal reference work pitched at, and for the benefit of, the South African public. These two initiatives and other similar initiatives are motivated to promote open access to the law by the people who are governed by it.
At present the open law initiatives are slowly gaining on their commercial equivalents and the law is becoming more and more accessible to a broader cross-section of the population. This shift is tremendously important because more meaningful and open access to the law is necessary for the promotion and protection of a number of fundamental rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights which, in turn, shapes the legal, political, social and economic frameworks of South African society and government. To quote the Declaration on Free Access to Law:
“Legal information institutes of the world, meeting in Montreal, declare that:
- Public legal information from all countries and international institutions is part of the common heritage of humanity. Maximising access to this information promotes justice and the rule of law;
- Public legal information is digital common property and should be accessible to all on a non-profit basis and free of charge;
- Independent non-profit organisations have the right to publish public legal information and the government bodies that create or control that information should provide access to it so that it can be published.
- Public legal information means legal information produced by public bodies that have a duty to produce law and make it public. It includes primary sources of law, such as legislation, case law and treaties, as well as various secondary (interpretative) public sources, such as reports on preparatory work and law reform, and resulting from boards of inquiry. It also includes legal documents created as a result of public funding.”
For more information on South African legal resources, where they can be found, and who owns these texts, check out the Open Law Project wiki page . If you would like to participate in the Open Law Project node on icommons.org, see the node page, here.
tags: johannesburg south africa policy-law south-africa law resources legislation cases judgments courts copyright
|
|
|
| |
add a comment: you must be logged on in order to comment. please log in or register at iCommons.org and and your comments right after.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
send
printer-friendly version
invite to vote
add a comment
